Initial Query on Site Moves
The discussion began with a user inquiring about a site move using Google Search Console's change of address feature. The initial question suggested a full site migration, asking if a new domain could be submitted even if a few old URLs still received traffic and hadn't been redirected yet. The user specifically asked:Mueller's initial response indicated that this scenario would generally be acceptable:"Do you have any thoughts on this GSC Change of Address question?
Can we submit the new domain if a few old URLs still get traffic and aren't redirected yet, or should we wait until all redirects are live?"
"It's generally fine (for example, some site moves keep the robots.txt on the old domain with 'allow: /' so that all URLs can be followed). The tool does check for the homepage redirect though."
The Problem with Partial Site Moves
However, Mueller's perspective shifted dramatically after the user provided additional context. It became clear that this was not a full site migration but a partial one: the homepage had moved, but many product and category pages were intended to remain on the old domain for an indefinite period. This meant the site would effectively operate across two domains simultaneously. This "one foot in, one foot out" approach presented a completely different challenge. Mueller quickly revised his advice, highlighting the inherent problems. He responded:"Practically speaking, it's not going to be seen as a full site move. You can still use the change of address tool, but it will be a messy situation until you've really moved it all over. If you need to do this (sometimes it's not easy, I get it :)), just know that it won't be a clean slate."
"...You'll have a hard time tracking things & Google will have a hard time understanding your sites. My recommendation would be to clean it up properly as soon as you can. Even properly planned & executed site migrations can be hard, and this makes it much more challenging."









